Dataset: productliability_award.csv Source: R.L. Culp Jr., and D. Pollage (2002). "The Rhetoric of Strict Products Liability versus Negligence: An Empirical Analysis," New York University Law Review, Vol. 77, #4, pp. 874-961. Description: Results of experiment with jurors being exposed to: Judge's Instruction: Strict Liability/Negligence/None Oral Arguments: Yes/No All jurors hear facts of case. Response: Award to plaintiff: Yes/No Jury Conditions: 1: Strict Liability/Oral Argument 2: Negligence/Oral Argument 3: No Instructions/No oral arguments (Control) 4: Strict Liability/No Oral Argument 5: Negligence/No Oral Argument Variables: Jury (1-6) juror (id - only used for ease of entering response) strict liability (1=Yes, 0=No) negligence (1=Yes, 0=No) oralArg (1=Yes, 0=No) award (1=Yes, 0=No)